With Mamak around, we have no weakness ...
What are our weaknesses? — Lim Mun Fah
MARCH 29 — The results for the 2010 Sijil Pelajaran Malaysia (SPM) have been released recently and 363 candidates from government schools obtained A+ in all subjects, 49 more candidates compared to 2009. When the Education Ministry and the people were immersed in excitement, the just-released Government Transformation Programme (GTP) Annual Report for 2010 have unexpectedly given us a rude awakening.
The report stated that Malaysian education outcomes have fallen behind countries like Singapore, Hong Kong and South Korea. In 2003, only 5 per cent to 7 per cent of Malaysian students have failed to achieve the minimum Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS) benchmarks but it have surged to 20 per cent in 2007.
The Malaysian student outcomes have dropped by 13 per cent in five years and no wonder the report has acknowledged that such outcomes are worrying.
If the report could be viewed as a health check of Malaysian Education, the result was undoubtedly a fail.
When more and more Malaysian students cannot even achieve the international minimum benchmarks, how could we be so excited for a few students who scored well? Instead of focusing on a small number of excellent students, aren’t we suppose to be concerned with the widening gap between outstanding students and poor performing students?
No examination or assessment is perfect. It is sometimes not necessarily a bad thing if the performance is not satisfactory or the rankings have dropped as we can see our gap with others from there.
Most importantly, we must be aware of our own weaknesses and reflect on whether our education system is heading towards a wrong direction.
Last December, Singapore students rated fifth in reading, second in mathematics and fourth in science among students from 65 economies in the test under the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) Program for International Student Assessment (PISA) while students in Shanghai topped every league table in the test.
“It gave the Europeans and the Americans quite a shock to suddenly discover that the Chinese in Shanghai are at such a high standard,” Singapore Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong stressed a month later.
Lee also reminded Singaporeans that: “The fact that we are up there gives us confidence that we are doing all right and that we are on the right track. But at the same time, it reminds us that there are some people, some countries which are better than us, and the competition is quite fierce.”
As for us, when the Universiti Malaya (UM) dropped from 180 to 207 in the prestigious 2010 QS World University Rankings, our ministers said that the fall in the world university rankings should not be taken as the only yardstick to assess local university quality.
For Singaporeans, even they have been ranked among the top, they are still “kiasu (fear of losing)” as they are aware that some people are doing better than them. As for us, even we have been going backward, we still “remain calm” and blindly looking for excuses for our failure.
What actually are our weaknesses? Could it be because we are unwilling to improve or lack the spirit of “kiasu” that has been most despised by us? — mysinchew.com
Comments