Independent body should probe trigger-happy cops
What happened to the high committee investigation into the police shooting of a Malaysian kid in Shah Alam?
We need our police - they are crucial for our safety - but what we worry about is when the police jeopardise our safety. It has always been said that it's better to let a thousand criminals escape than to endanger one innocent person.
Isn't it ironical that when Amirulrasyid was shot dead by the police, everyone including the top brass were very quick to justify the killing by claiming he was a parang-wielding criminal who had reversed into the police. And now the IGP is stating that the police saying sorry will have legal implications, but I believe it should work both ways.
In this context, the standing orders for police to draw their guns is deeply flawed. The standing orders as reported in the press go like this:
'Police draw their guns when they believe they (or other people) are in imminent danger of serious injury or death when apprehending a suspect believed to have committed an offence punishable by life imprisonment or death'.
But the police can't and shouldn't decide whether a person has committed an offence punishable by death as that's for the courts to decide. It's not up to police in hot pursuit to decide that, because even someone looking at a two-month prison term might run from the police. Do they deserve to be shot?
If that's the case, why do we bother with courts and an attorney-general's chambers. This is where the major problem lies. There have been many cases where suspects have been shot and it was alleged that they were putting the police in danger, but no one knows the truth since none of these cases have been investigated by a third party or other government bodies.
The police standing orders also seem to put the safety of the public below the safety of the police. Policemen who are trained and well-equipped have nothing to fear from a car running away.
Of course, none of us would even raise a whimper if the police shot armed robbers endangering civilian lives. I remember always thinking when some robbers get shot in the act, I say to myself padan muka. Good riddance.
There should be an automatic inquiry by an independent body who know police work and how they operate after all shooting incidents.
A policeman's primary and only duty is to protect the safety of the public. It is not a voluntary
job, they get paid for it. If the public's expectations of them to be more careful and be not so trigger happy saddens them – then maybe they should try a different career. Postmen's salaries are higher now, so maybe that would be a safer job to switch to?
We need our police - they are crucial for our safety - but what we worry about is when the police jeopardise our safety. It has always been said that it's better to let a thousand criminals escape than to endanger one innocent person.
Isn't it ironical that when Amirulrasyid was shot dead by the police, everyone including the top brass were very quick to justify the killing by claiming he was a parang-wielding criminal who had reversed into the police. And now the IGP is stating that the police saying sorry will have legal implications, but I believe it should work both ways.
In this context, the standing orders for police to draw their guns is deeply flawed. The standing orders as reported in the press go like this:
'Police draw their guns when they believe they (or other people) are in imminent danger of serious injury or death when apprehending a suspect believed to have committed an offence punishable by life imprisonment or death'.
But the police can't and shouldn't decide whether a person has committed an offence punishable by death as that's for the courts to decide. It's not up to police in hot pursuit to decide that, because even someone looking at a two-month prison term might run from the police. Do they deserve to be shot?
If that's the case, why do we bother with courts and an attorney-general's chambers. This is where the major problem lies. There have been many cases where suspects have been shot and it was alleged that they were putting the police in danger, but no one knows the truth since none of these cases have been investigated by a third party or other government bodies.
The police standing orders also seem to put the safety of the public below the safety of the police. Policemen who are trained and well-equipped have nothing to fear from a car running away.
Of course, none of us would even raise a whimper if the police shot armed robbers endangering civilian lives. I remember always thinking when some robbers get shot in the act, I say to myself padan muka. Good riddance.
There should be an automatic inquiry by an independent body who know police work and how they operate after all shooting incidents.
A policeman's primary and only duty is to protect the safety of the public. It is not a voluntary
job, they get paid for it. If the public's expectations of them to be more careful and be not so trigger happy saddens them – then maybe they should try a different career. Postmen's salaries are higher now, so maybe that would be a safer job to switch to?
by A Citizen
Related: -
Wife gets RM1.4m for husband's death in police custody - The ...
30 Jun 2010 ... Wife gets RM1.4m for husband's death in police custody. ... The MalaysianInsider. Thursday, 22 July 2010 Last Update: 03:50pm ...
www.themalaysianinsider.com/malaysia/.../wife-gets-rm1.4m-for-husbands-death-in-police-custody/ - CachedOur Main website Is Back Online
Harakah newsreport in June 2000 on death in police custody victim Anuar bin ... Also 'deathnote' by Polis Raja Di Malaysia. July 8, 2010 // s.jayathas ...
www.humanrightspartymalaysia.com/2010/.../harakah-newsreport-in-june-2000-on-death-in-police-custody-victim-anuar-bin-sarip-champione... - CachedNational Express Malaysia
Death in custody - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
A Kugan's death in police custody: Murder « I Am Malaysian
23 Jan 2009 ... I've read about other people dying under police custody. ... For Kugan to die of a violent death and without dignity is a great shame to the deceased .... BUM2010 – Moving Malaysia Forward · Police shoot dead yet another ...
malaysianpolitics.wordpress.com/.../a-kugans-death-in-police-custody-murder/ -Cached - SimilarUnprecedented judgment against UMNO government in death in police ...
After 10 years of waging a war against this death in police custody, P. Uthayakumar was able to obtain a judgment in favor of a. Malay Malaysian ...
www.malaysia-today.net/index.php?...death-in-police-custody... - CachedRIGHTS-MALAYSIA: Custodial Death Revives Calls For Police Reforms ...
6 Feb 2009 ... The death of a youth in police custody and the torture of another in a police lockup, ... Making 2010 a Turning Point for Women's Health ...
ipsnews.net/news.asp?idnews=45695 - CachedHousewife Gets RM1.4 Million Damages Over Husband's Death in ...
30 Jun 2010 ... KUALA LUMPUR 30 JUNE 2010 A housewife who won a negligence suit ...and the government over her husband s death while in police custody in ...
www.malaysiandigest.com/.../5172-housewife-gets-rm14-million-damages-over-husbands-death-in-police-custody.html - Malaysia - CachedOur Main website Is Back Online
30 Jun 2010 ... HRP: RM 1.4 Million Human Rights victory for death in police custody ...Petition \'HINDRAF & HRP Petition to Malaysian PM Najib Razak - Indian ... 17/7/2010, Bilik Gerakan HRP Tawan Parliament Padang Serai & DUN Lunas, ... the series of public interest cases of death in police custody by HRP which ...
www.hrp-my.org/2010/.../hrp-rm-1-4-million-human-rights-victory-for-death-in-police-custody-victim-anuar-bin-sarip/ - CachedMalaysian woman wins damages for husband's death in police custody ...
30 Jun 2010 ... In Wednesday's ruling, Judicial Commissioner Lee Swee Seng said death in police custody was a disturbing matter. ...
www.monstersandcritics.com/.../Malaysian-woman-wins-damages-for-husband-s-death-in-police-custody - United States - Cached
Comments