Kangaroo court hearing for Sivakumar?
I refer to the Malaysiakini inform Speaker vs speaker: Sivakumar loses appeal.
There are dual unfortunate things in this report.
Even if the row had discussed the case during lunch time, there were still the some-more than dual hours long submission and reply by Chan Kok Keong after which Juctice Malik pronounced the interest was discharged unanimously, without even seeking left or right.
Shouldn't these submissions additionally have been discussed by the panel?
After all, the idea of hearings is to persuade the row to change the mind and win the decision by majority. And Malik's remarks on costs were really telling.
When Ganesan's counsel asked for RM20,000 costs, Malik said, 'Can we give you more?' meaning which he should have asked for some-more and he would have been since more.
Was the decision pre-ordained, we wonder?
There are dual unfortunate things in this report.
Even if the row had discussed the case during lunch time, there were still the some-more than dual hours long submission and reply by Chan Kok Keong after which Juctice Malik pronounced the interest was discharged unanimously, without even seeking left or right.
Shouldn't these submissions additionally have been discussed by the panel?
After all, the idea of hearings is to persuade the row to change the mind and win the decision by majority. And Malik's remarks on costs were really telling.
When Ganesan's counsel asked for RM20,000 costs, Malik said, 'Can we give you more?' meaning which he should have asked for some-more and he would have been since more.
Was the decision pre-ordained, we wonder?
Comments