Was it worth cordoning off Dataran Merdeka?
Bersih 3.0!
300,000 participants.
Really, with such a turnout, was Dataran Merdeka even necessary, other than serving as a convening point for participants (rather than rubbing off on the concept of 'freedom' it is supposed to symbolize)?
The point has again been made in no uncertain terms that Malaysians want, nay, demand 'clean and fair elections'.
That I even have to use quotation marks to emphasize 'clean and fair elections' indicates how alien such a process, namely 'clean and fair elections', has become in Malaysia, especially in the last thirty years or so. It could have been something we should at least expect, if not take for granted in the way voters in other countries with real democracies do.
It's an indictment on the absence of the so-called impartiality, independence and integrity in the Election Commission (EC) that I have to use those quotation marks to highlight Bersih's raison d'être for its mammoth sit-in. The EC Chairperson and his deputy are UMNO members eh, ptui!
Our democratic dues have to become instead a quest through such Bersih campaigns. The two Dirty Rotten Scoundrels heading the EC must resign or be removed.
But alas, Bersih has had its peaceful sit-in blemished by the incident of police tear-gassing a section of the crowd. The men in blue claimed they had to when someone broke through the fenced up Square and was then joined by many.
Now, that a small group breaking through the police barrier has not been disputed. But what Bersih (in the person of Ambiga Sreenevasan) hasn't been able to confirm yet has been the identity of that unruly mob, who in ignoring Ambiga's instruction to end the sit-in and disperse, has brought about (or set up the excuse for) the violence.
Naturally Ambiga wants to lay her hands quickly on some facts. She's very upset that the violence had taken place and spoilt the otherwise perfect profile of a peaceful sit-in. Ambiga demands that the full extent of the law apply to those responsible, regardless of who they are.
Who were they?
Inevitably the authority and PKR are pointing fingers at each other.
PKR, and I suppose Pakatan, claim that they were UMNO agents provoc! ateur se nt to incite violence to cast aspersions on the participants, in particular Anwar Ibrahim. I read of this in Bernama which asserted that Anwar gave the order for his people to break through and occupy Dataran Merdeka. But given the news outlet's political allegiance and my lack of confidence in its impartiality I hesitate to accept its pitch wholesale yet.
I said I 'hesitated' because, while I am not confident of Bernama, it is not totally implausible for a scenario which sees a hot head, fired up by the momentous occasion and with adrenalin on speed, decided to burst through the police cordon in a solo bid for glory. And he could have supporters who too might have wanted to share that moment of exuberant glory. When there were 300,000 participants who could really claim all were in peaceful control of themselves?
Muhyiddin naturally put the blame on Bersih but then he's so low brow we can just ignore that political Neanderthal's usual mumbling.
Now, I did warn in my earlier post Bersih - "Uncle okay?", Auntie is okay! that:
Pakatan leaders, Anwar Ibrahim, Hadi Awang & Lim Kit Siang and their senior lieutenants, must allow Bersih to be seen clearly by the Malaysian public as a non-Pakatan affiliated movement for clean and fair elections, and deserving of support by ALL concerned citizens, thus these Pakat! an leade rs, while supporting Bersih, must remain in the publicity background and not selfishly hijack the rally for their own political interests.
But Anwar just had to make a speech, didn't he? Couldn't he remain quietly in the background and let Ambiga be the main person for the day? Why must he have to make a speech which invariably would overlay the civil movement with the sheen of political parties? Knowing manmanlai's craze for publicity and the spotlight, I had not been wrong to predict his inability to stay in the background.
And I read that there were cries of 'Hancur Rosmah'. Typical! WTF has that got to do with Bersih?
As I had written:
In the synthesized declarations of Ambiga Sreenevasan and Maria Chin Abdullah: "Bersih is a coalition of 84 NGOs and not a political organization. Civil society will lead its rally and assembly." The message to Malaysians must be unequivocally and unambiguously clear that Bersih 3.0 in demanding clean and fair elections is a campaign by very concerned and politically-neutral citizens who are neither pro Pakatan nor anti BN, or vice versa. Far more importantly, Bersih's efforts are pro public interests and anti-corrupt elections. Bersih seeks to prevent nefarious forces from cheating the ! voters o f their choice of representatives.
Alas, that was not to be.
The regrettable observations were the following:
(1) Marina Mahathir made the most striking observation which sent her ballistic – she was wont to write in her blog Rantings by MM:
I saw the photos of the police rolling out the barbed wire and I saw red. Since when did our police, or whoever is their boss, roll out barbed wire - barbed wire!! - against their own people?? Are we thugs? Terrorists? Thieves?
 |
| Marina Mahathir at the police razor wired barrier photo from her blog |
(2) Violence against the police which required some cooler hea! ds in th e rally to provide protection for a police driver who had hit several participants, and where even his police car was overturned. He subsequently informed Malaysiakini that he had passed out from losing a lot of blood after a "hard object hit his head on the left side" - see MKINI's Driver: I passed out before crash.
As much as I deplore police brutality, and indeed our police have a notorious reputation for such, I have to worry when members of the public attacked the police and police property. This smacked of anarchism or worse, armed revolt.
The last time I heard of police being attacked was from my uncle who revealed that some thirty years ago, a (Indian) police inspector in Alor Setar, known for his brutality and bullying ways, bashed up a Royal Malay Regiment soldier on one of his arrogant kick-a! ss foray s. Wrong person to bash!
The victim marshalled his mates from the barracks and armed to the teeth surrounded the police station where the brute was. Several shots were fired in the air with the soldiers demanding the inspector step out to face the music (rat-tat-tat music?). My Uncle heard that the IGP and Army Chief had to swiftly intervene before Fort Apache with our MGR in it were blasted up to shreds.
In a much earlier incident (in the 70's?) the IGP was assassinated in the heart of KL by a CT. And even earlier than that, my granduncle who served in the SB was assassinated, also by a CT.
But such violence against the police meant breaking the law, and this was precisely what DAP's VP, Tunku Abdul Aziz, had been worried about when he refused to back Bersih. Should the authority's (and Bernama's) allegations against Anwar Ibrahim for egging his people to break the police cordon of Dataran Merdeka prove to be correct, there's going to be a lot of "I told you so" at DAP HQs.
But in the same token, reports (with photos) of the police bashing some protestors out of anger because they (the police) heard a policeman was killed (which turned out to be untrue), was sheer total lack of professionalism and discipline. Such a lamentable state of affairs is even worse than anarchy or violent revolt, because we expect professionals to behave professionally. But then, the PDRM haven't been exactly noted for professionalism and discipline! .
Now, regardless of whether UMNO had sent its agents provocateur or that a PKR supporter decided to do the exact opposite of what Steve McQueen did in The Great Escape, breaking in instead of out, Bersih has been a success, though marred by a situation which saw Malaysians being pitted violently against Malaysians – Malaysian civilians against Malaysian police and vice versa.
More » Barisan Nasional (BN) | Pakatan Rakyat (PR) | Sociopolitics Plus | 大马社会政治
Comments